my own private I dunno: résumé | screenplays | fan fiction

no one appreciates writers, even the people who hire them

| | comments (5)

I'm still fuming over this ad, spotted on Los Angeles Craigslist, seeking a "Very Brainy + Creative Thinker, Planner, Editor" for a series of high-end newsmagazines covering ritzy Southern California communities including Malibu Beach and Beverly Hills.

The publisher is looking for a brilliant miracle worker:

We need more intellectual firepower, investigative articles on serious issues.

We should do more interviews with top-level movers and shakers, authors, academics, CEOs, political leaders, etc.

...

This is for someone really brainy who wants to test the envelope.

...

I see you as someone who comes up with 4-5 really great ideas every month that we should write about. You could do some or all of the writing, or you could help me find just the right writer or writers who should.

...

This is NOT a role in which you will say to me, "What do you want me to write about this month?" It's VERY MUCH a role in which you will say to me, "Here are five fantastic ideas your readers will absolutely love." And then I want those ideas to be so great that I'll simply say "yes, yes, yes, yes -- and yes."

Sounds like a vital job for this enterprise, a combination of ingenuity and creativity, the kind of stuff that's unfakeable, that's invaluable, that cannot be done by just anyone. Plus, it will feed on the new job holder's own network of contacts both within the industry -- if the publisher expects this person to have access to a stable of writers, plus have PR contacts that will put him/her in touch with "top-level movers and shakers" -- as well as within the community, if this person will be ferreting out stories that readers have not already come across in other local publications, stories that make them go Wow!

As if to reemphasize how special a person someone will have to be to take on this extraordinary job, the ad spells it all out:

Please be smart, educated, talented, insightful, visionary, peppy, clever, earnest, fun, positive, reliable, organized, sane, honest, willing to work -- and eager to make a difference.

And what will the remuneration for this extraordinary person be?

For great story ideas, I see paying you $20 per idea we use, with a maximum of five, or $100 a month.

If you write the story, I see paying you 20 cents a word. So a 1,000 word article nets you $200.

If you aren't perfect for writing the story, but find the right person who is, I see another $20 "finder's fee."

So you could make maybe $100 - $500 a month doing this.

But hey, don't be so glum:

it's not really a "job job," it's more an advisory role -- something fun and stimulating for you to take on in addition to whatever else you're doing.

See, you get paid in fun! Who doesn't love fun?

What? You say you expect to be paid on a scale commensurate with your total awesomeness? Are you some kind of idiot? Don't you know that

writing and/or editing is not a road to riches

and also that

this is not a get-rich-quick scheme.

Geez, you geniuses with your brilliant ideas and massive network of contacts, you really do expect something for nothing, don't you?

(Technorati tags: )

5 Comments

Is this a joke? It doesn't seem like a particularly good joke, but perhaps it's a weird, bad joke? Anyone with that level of skills, energy, experience, and connections, would be insane to take this job at all, let alone for that kind of money. If you were that amazing a person, you could just skip the idiot middle man and run your own magazine. Now that would be "fun and stimulating."
I don't think it's a joke.
There are more writers than there are jobs for writers, thus the laws of supply and demand keep our average wages low. Most of the artists I've known have second jobs, including myself, from serving coffee to teaching. A reknown American poet named Wallace was the VP of an insurance company. When a reporter asked one of his co-workers about Wallace's poetry, he just said, "Wally writes poetry?" Additionally, profit margins are getting thinner for magazines. Another problem is that writers don't just write for money, unlike most publishers who work their way up through the sales department instead of the editorial department. Since money isn't a writer's prime motivation, a lot of us keep writing despite the poor returns, keeping the supply of writers higher than economic logic dictates, thus keeping the wages low.
This nonsense about writers not writing for money has got to stop. Many people love their work, but it doesn't mean they shouldn't be paid for it. Would you go to a doctor who works for free, because he loves it so much? Would you hire a plumber who works for free, because pipes just speak to him? Why would anyone trust such clear nonsense? Why do they trust it when it comes to writers?
If you’re good at something, never do it for free. --Heath Ledger, The Dark Knight (2008)

Leave a comment


I'm MaryAnn Johanson, writer and editor, and this is my scratch pad, idea-jotter-downer, portfolio and resume, and general hang-out blog.

• film/TV/pop culture critic at FlickFilosopher.com
• contributor, Film.com
• member, Online Film Critics Society
• member, Alliance of Women Film Journalists
• member, International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences

[become a Facebook fan]
[visit my personal Facebook page]
[follow me on Twitter]


Location: New York City
[email me]

photo by David Speranza

archives

recently at FlickFilosopher.com

Powered by Movable Type 5.01

what I’m watching
(region 1)

what I’m watching
(region 2)

what I’m reading



my book
(Amazon U.S.)

my book
(Amazon U.K.)