my own private I dunno: résumé | screenplays | fan fiction

a question about the Creation Museum: I pray for enlightenment

| | comments (8)

I’m confused about something. Maybe someone can ’splain me this.

See, I’m browsing through the inspirational brochure of the new Creation Museum in Kentucky. (Link goes to a PDF. I hereby offer up this warning to all those sinning webmasters who do not alert their readers to such slow-downloading, new-app-launching, linking perfidy.) And I am finding myself quite moved by suchness as:

Walk through the Garden of Eden. Introduce yourself to our chameleons. Examine bones, the clutch of eggs from a dinosaur, an exceptional fossil collection, and a mineral collection. Enter the Cave of Sorrows and see the horrific effects of the Fall of man.

Already I feel closer to the all-embracing warmth of religious faith. Who doesn’t long to visit the Cave of Sorrows?

But then there’s this:

[T]he purpose of the museum is three-fold. First, it acts as a rallying place, calling people back to the absolute truth of the Bible. It is a place of revival, a starting point for a new reformation. Second, it is a witnessing tool. There will be those who sneer, but some will be challenged to think, and still others may come to believe. And finally, it is a valuable, unprecedented resource for information and education, enabling us to always be ready to give an answer (a reasoned, logical defense) for the hope that is within us (1 Peter 3:15).

The impact of the brochure is such that I am ready to book a trip to Kentucky immediately so that I may learn to accept the absolute, literal truth of the Bible via the museum. So I go to the museum’s Web site, where I am startled to discover that the museum is open seven days a week!

Now, in my ongoing studies of the Bible and its literal, absolute truth, I have, of course, come across this:

Ye shall keep the sabbath therefore; for it [is] holy unto you: every one that defileth it shall surely be put to death: for whosoever doeth [any] work therein, that soul shall be cut off from among his people. Six days may work be done; but in the seventh [is] the sabbath of rest, holy to the LORD: whosoever doeth [any] work in the sabbath day, he shall surely be put to death. ( Exo. 31:14-15)

Granted, there is some confusion over whether Saturday or Sunday is the proper sabbath day, the proper day upon which one should be put to death for working, but clearly, it must be at least one of these two days.

So what I’m confused about is this: If I visit the Creation Museum on a Sunday, is it my duty as a believer in the absolute, literal truth of the Bible to determine which, if any, of the employees working at the museum on that day also worked the day before? And would it also be my duty to put those sabbath-defying employees to death myself, or is there a Putting to Death for Working on the Sabbath Department at the museum? The brochure is unclear, and I’m trying to be reasonable and logical about this.

Also, I am praying for the sinners at Media Bistro, who called the museum “a great place to visit if you wanted to take a look at $27 million dollars worth of crazy”; for the sodomite actor who portrays Adam in one of the videos at the museum; and for Alfred Russel Wallace, currently spending eternity in hellfire jabbing Charles Darwin in various orifices with hot pokers while Darwin does the same to him. I bet they’re sorry now.

(Technorati tags: , , )

8 Comments

I adore you, fellow sinner. I'll save a spot next to me in hell. =^)
Do I really have to go all the way to Kentucky to see the horrific effects of the fall of man?
Mary Ann, do you think that only one person is running the entire museum? Did it ever occur to you that the day of worship is actually arbitrary? If it was closed on Sundays, then people who worship on Saturday couldn't go on Sunday---which may be their only other non-work day. And likewise for Saturday. Thus the employees who worship on Sunday will not work Sunday, and the employees who worship Saturday will not work Saturday. Crazy, I know!
MaryAnn did raise the question of whether anyone is working there on both Saturday and Sunday... Personally, my biggest beef with the whole Creation story is that some people literally believe that the world was created some 6,000 years ago (if you trust the calculations of Bishop Ussher that it all started in 4004 BC), despite all of the evidence that it's much, much older than that. The point I usually raise is that back when the Bible was first being written down, people were woefully ignorant: They didn't know squat about science, or DNA, or dinosaurs. Heck, they didn't even know that the Earth is round. So what they wrote was informed by their very lack of understanding of how the Universe really works, how old it is, how old the Earth is, etc. If the Book of Genesis could be rewritten today, so that the first chapter started something like this, it would resolve a lot of problems (I wrote this several years ago in response to a Creation vs. Evolution argument):
In the beginning there was nothing except God. Then God issued forth a divine spark into the void, and the spark blossomed into galaxies containing billions of stars, around which orbited many planets. And God saw that some of these worlds might be suitable to support Life; so God manipulated energy and matter, and created amino acids in pools of chemicals. He saw that these were good, so He decided to allow the amino acids to join themselves into proteins and DNA. When He saw that DNA had the ability to replicate itself into self-organizing forms of Life, He was pleased. Over the eons, God took pleasure in allowing the DNA to replicate as it saw fit; He provided divine guidance to the DNA by making sure that Life evolved into more complex forms that were more capable of surviving and thriving in their environment. Some forms of Life thrived for long periods of time, but God decided that they were not quite what He had in mind for one particular world, so He wiped the slate clean by allowing an asteroid to crash into the world. Then, He saw that a new form of Life, which He called "mammals", had great potential. Over millions of years, He steered their evolution into the form known as Man. And when He saw Man, He knew that this form of Life pleased Him.
I know MaryAnn's an atheist, but you have to admit that if Genesis started something like this, it would defuse some (not all) of the acrimony between Creationists and Evolutionists/scientists. Yes, what I wrote does refer a bit to Intelligent Design theory, but then at least we could all acknowledge that the Earth is billions of years old and we are only relative newcomers to it, and the main remaining argument would be whether God exists or not. You could very easily remove the "we're here because God tweaked Life on Earth" part of the above text and it would still be better than what Genesis says now. Personally, I hold that the Creation story is metaphorical at best and that the Universe and humanity have evolved into their present forms all by themselves, with no outside intervention. I do NOT believe in Intelligent Design... but I acknowledge that it's possible that there is a God up there somewhere. The trick is you can't prove it either way.
I know MaryAnn's an atheist, but you have to admit that if Genesis started something like this,
The same could be said about every "holy book" and creation myth and other story handed down from the ancient mists of unrecorded history.
Mary Ann, do you think that only one person is running the entire museum?
I wonder how people who actually believe this nonsense justify using computers and other technology that we are able to make work because our understanding of the natural universe is actually pretty good...
Whadyya mean? I pray to the computer fairies all the time. You almost sound like you don't believe in computer fairies. Anyways, I just saw the best line on this topic, from a comment left on some dudes blog: "... However, Penn and Teller also did a show about how the Bible was false, so I suppose one should take them with a grain of salt." Lines like that poke little holes in my otherwise excessive optimism about humanities prospects... Sometimes I think the galactic civilization is just waiting for us to stop talking to our imaginary friends before they say hi and welcome us into society.
ClayJ may need to revise his bible... http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100202101245.htm New Research Rejects 80-Year Theory of 'Primordial Soup' as the Origin of Life As for the Sunday / Sabbath issue, didn't Jesus say that he had fulfilled the law? And it's the only one of the 10 commandments not repeated in the new testament. And the Bible is divinely inspired, those who wrote it would have access to revelation about the universe... like the "sphere of the earth" in Psalms, or Job's "He hangs the earth on nothing." I can't take the Bible half-way. ClayJ's bible isn't logical; if it's wrong in one place and needs to be re-written, I reject the whole Bible outright, because then who decides what is right and isn't? If one bases belief on the Bible, then it has to be all or nothing.

Leave a comment


I'm MaryAnn Johanson, writer and editor, and this is my scratch pad, idea-jotter-downer, portfolio and resume, and general hang-out blog.

• film/TV/pop culture critic at FlickFilosopher.com
• contributor, Film.com
• member, Online Film Critics Society
• member, Alliance of Women Film Journalists
• member, International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences

[become a Facebook fan]
[visit my personal Facebook page]
[follow me on Twitter]


Location: New York City
[email me]

photo by David Speranza

archives

recently at FlickFilosopher.com

Powered by Movable Type 5.01

what I’m watching
(region 1)

what I’m watching
(region 2)

what I’m reading



my book
(Amazon U.S.)

my book
(Amazon U.K.)