my own private I dunno: résumé | screenplays | fan fiction

The handmaid’s wail: forever pregnant

| | comments (11)

I don’t want Geek Philosophy to turn into yet another political blog -- there are enough people, and better informed ones than me, already doing that -- but it’s hard to cut myself off from political topics when it seems like every day there’s another news story that sounds like a dispatch from a dystopian science fiction novel. It was only a few days ago that I thought I had seen the ultimate warning sign of the coming of the Republic of Gilead, but a horrifying article in today’s Washington Post smacked me in the face and invited me to think -- and scream -- again:

Forever Pregnant
Guidelines: Treat Nearly All Women as Pre-Pregnant
By January W. Payne
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, May 16, 2006; Page HE01

New federal guidelines ask all females capable of conceiving a baby to treat themselves -- and to be treated by the health care system -- as pre-pregnant, regardless of whether they plan to get pregnant anytime soon.

Among other things, this means all women between first menstrual period and menopause should take folic acid supplements, refrain from smoking, maintain a healthy weight and keep chronic conditions such as asthma and diabetes under control.

Now, of course, encouraging women to engage in healthy habits is a good thing, but framing it as purely a need to keep babymaking machines in shape is appalling. Why stop at supplements and stopping smoking, as Rebecca Traister at the Salon blog Broadsheet wonders:

What about avoiding sushi, uncooked meats and unpasteurized cheeses? Perhaps women should only be allowed on planes once it has been determined, by routine pelvic exams administered at the gate, that they are not carrying a fetus that could experience trauma midflight....

Pretending that we're going to solve this problem by instituting guidelines that treat women as baby incubators is not the solution. All it does is reinforce an attitude that problems women have with reproduction are the only ones worth worrying about. How about federal recommendations about using birth control to prevent HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases? How about federal guidelines that require doctors to talk to women about the dangers smoking, poor nutrition, unprotected sex, drug use, lack of exercise, and heavy drinking can pose for them, and not just their precious potential cargo?

But perhaps the best illustration of how ridiculous -- and scary -- this kind of thinking is, just imagine if men’s health issues were treated merely as adjuncts of their duty to make healthy babies:

Forever Fathering
Guidelines: Treat Nearly All Men as Pre-Inseminators
by MaryAnn Johanson
Geek Philosophy Staff Writer
Wednesday, May 17, 2006

New federal guidelines ask all males capable of fathering a baby to treat themselves -- and to be treated by the health care system -- as pre-inseminators, regardless of whether they plan to impregnant a woman or women anytime soon.

Among other things, this means all men between first nocturnal emission and death should take L-Carnitine supplements, refrain from smoking, maintain a healthy weight, avoid wearing jockey shorts, quit taking hot showers or baths or soaking in hot tubs, and keep chronic conditions such as asthma and diabetes under control.

While most of these recommendations are well known to men who are inseminators or seeking to inseminate, experts say it's important that men follow this advice throughout their reproductive lives, because about half of pregnancies are unplanned and so much damage can be done to a fetus if the inseminating sperm is not as healthy as possible.

The recommendations aim to "increase public awareness of the importance of preconception health" and emphasize the "importance of managing risk factors prior to insemination," said Samantha Posner, co-author of the guidelines and associate director for science in the division of reproductive health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which issued the report.

Other groups involved include the American College of Urologists, the March of Dimes, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention's Division of Reproductive Health and the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities.

The idea of preconception care has been discussed for nearly 20 years, experts said, but it has drawn more attention recently. Progress toward further reducing the rate of unhealthy pregnancy results, including premature birth, low birthweight and infant mortality, has slowed in the United States since 1996 "in part because of inconsistent delivery and implementation of interventions before insemination to detect, treat and help men modify behaviors, health conditions and risk factors that contribute to adverse maternal and infant outcomes," according to the report.

Preconception care should be delivered by any doctor a patient sees -- from his primary care physician to his urologist. It involves developing a "reproductive health plan" that details if and when children are planned, said Janis Biermann, a report co-author and vice president for education and health promotion at the March of Dimes.

"The recommendations say we need to be opportunistic," or deliver care and counseling when opportunities arise, said Merry-K. Moos, a professor in the University of North Carolina's paternal fetal medicine division who sat on the CDC advisory panel. "Healthier men are healthier inseminators."

Men should also make sure all vaccinations are up-to-date and avoid contact with lead-based paints, radiation, pesticides, and other chemicals, Biermann said.

The report recommends that men stop smoking and discuss with their doctor the danger alcohol poses to semen.

Research shows that "during the days before insemination" -- during which a man may not yet realize that he’s about to impregnate a woman -- "exposure to alcohol, tobacco and other drugs; lack of essential vitamins (e.g., L-Carnitine); and workplace hazards can adversely affect semen production and result in pregnancy complications and poor outcomes for both the mother and the infant," the report states.

Obstacles to preconception care include getting insurance companies to pay for visits and putting the concept into regular use by doctors and patients. Experts acknowledge that men with no plans to inseminate in the near future may resist preconception care.

"We know that men -- unless you're actively planning [an impregnation], . . . he doesn't want to talk about it," Biermann said. So clinicians must find a "way to do this and not scare men," by promoting preconception care as part of standard men's health care, she said.

Some medical facilities have already found a way to weave preconception care in with regular visits. At Montefiore Medical Center in Bronx, N.Y., a form that's filled out when checking a patient's height, weight and blood pressure prompts nurses to ask men, "Do you smoke, and do you plan to inseminate a woman or women in the next year? And if not, what birth control are you using?"

"It's a simple way of getting primary care providers to think about preconception care," said Patricia Bernstein, a paternal fetal medicine specialist who sat on the advisory committee that helped produce the report. "It's simple and [it] costs nothing." ·

But that would never happen, right? Long before then, we’ll be seeing this kind of thing:

(Technorati tags: , , , , )

11 Comments

This pisses me off - for all the reasons you stated, PLUS: What happens once you hit menopause? Is this gov't really only interested in my health while I am capable of ovulation? And if these are federal guidelines, perhaps funding will start for those considered "prepregnant" - but what if you are ovulation age and have already decided NOT to ever have children? Will you have to hide that decision in order to get whatever gov't subsidised healthcare is offered to 'breeders'? WTF?
Oh, you silly girl, you! You may think you have decided not to ever have children, but just you try sticking to that when you can't get birth control -- which you won't, if the rabid religious right gets its way, and Jesus decrees that they will -- and your husband insists you perform your wifely duties. Of course, you could stay single forever, like some sort of unwomanly freak, but at least then you'll be able to remain safely barren, because no decent Christian woman would have sex outside marriage. Unless you got raped, I guess, but then you'd surely have been asking for it which would mean you weren't a decent woman anyway, and hence worthy only of disdain from the medical establishment anyway.
Ugh. Yeah, tons of people are having unplanned pregnancies, and the babies are therefore suffering because of poor health habits beforehand. So the obvious solution is to have better sex education, and provide better birth control to people to reduce the number of unplanned pregnancies, right? No, you silly goose, of course it's not. The solution is that we should all always be preparing to have a baby at any time. Morons.
But if you tell people that sex exists, they might have sex even if they DON'T want to have a baby! And then they'll burn in hell forever! Don't you see, it's for their own good that we shield them from the temptation of sex until they make the mature decision to procreate.
Ev-er-y Egg is Sacred, Ev-er-y Egg is great.... If an Egg gets waaaaasted, God gets quite irate...
What happens if you're infertile?
You are declared Unwoman and shipped to Guantanamo Bay.
MaryAnn, Years ago I heard a National Public Radio story about women who drink heavily and frequently while they are pregnant, resulting in babies virually certain to be born with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. I understand that it's miserable to have FAS, and there's not much that can be done to fix it. As a spot of blue in a red state, I'm a pro-choice supporter and voter. But I would be very tempted to pass laws that make serious drinking while pregnant illegal, for the same reason that suicide is illegal, so society can intervene and stop behavior. For me, the most compelling reason not to have such laws are recommendations by the American Medical Association, the National Organization on Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, and others. The NOFAS website says in part, "At NOFAS, we believe that a legal approach will only deter women with an alcohol problem from seeking prenatal care," said Tom Donaldson, NOFAS president. "We fear this would lead to a rise in fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASDs)." I wish very, very much that society could help people avoid FAS. According to the geeks at the AMA and NOFAS, yeah-buddy we can! They recommend education and access to treatment, as being a lot more helpful than jail. I'd be willing to pay a little more in taxes to for practical solutions to problems.
I say we put 100 percent effective birth control in the water, something that renders both men and women completely infertile (while having no pesky side effects, of course). But, at the same time, we make the antidote -- which is also, of course, 100 percent effective -- readily and freely available. This way, no one is prevented from getting pregnant whenever they want, but no one gets pregnant accidentally, either. And both mother and father would have to decide that it was time for a rugrat -- there would be none of this "He told me he'd had a vasectomy" or "She told me she was on the pill" nonsense. The biggest side effect of this is that the world population would drop dramatically within years: I think the estimate that half of all pregnancies are unplanned is too low. Lots of people would never procreate if they had to make a conscious decision to do so.
What a wonderful world it might be :)
Infertiles to Guantanamo Bay? Well, I could use a vacation...

Leave a comment


I'm MaryAnn Johanson, writer and editor, and this is my scratch pad, idea-jotter-downer, portfolio and resume, and general hang-out blog.

• film/TV/pop culture critic at FlickFilosopher.com
• contributor, Film.com
• member, Online Film Critics Society
• member, Alliance of Women Film Journalists
• member, International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences

Location: New York City
[email me]

photo by David Speranza

archives

Powered by Movable Type 4.1

what I’m watching
(region 1)

what I’m watching
(region 2)

what I’m reading

my book
(Amazon U.S.)

my book
(Amazon U.K.)