my own private I dunno: résumé | screenplays | fan fiction

Building the Internet bookshelf

| | comments (13)

Geeks are a diverse lot, so making generalizations is always tricky, but I think maybe it’s safe to say that one attribute that unifies geeks is a love of books. Maybe not all the same books -- maybe one guy collects tons of comic books and someone else likes 18th-century French poetry and that girl over there, she’s into contemporary murder mysteries and yet another reader simply must own every science fiction novel ever published in Eastern Europe. Bibliophiles are by definition geeks, and maybe booklovers in ancient times were the original geeks. And part of what geekiness is today is a desire to look at the world from all sorts of angles, news ones as well as the tried-and-true, and what better way to do that than with books?

Me, my library was somewhat diminished by a poverty-induced selloff a few years back -- thank god for NYC’s Strand Bookstore and its bookbuying desk; I actually raised the rent one lean month by hauling in boxes and boxes of books. But it’s growing again, slowly, and the composition, subjectwise, hasn’t really changed much: lots of science (biology, psychology, physics), mythology (of the comparative type, mostly), history (a lot of fundamental-interconnectedness-of-all-things stuff), science fiction and fantasy, classics, a fair selection of children’s books (ones with aspects of the fantastic). Smatterings of all sorts of other things. I have a litmus test for new acquaintances visiting my apartment for the first time: the ones who say, “Wow, have you read all these books?” are the ones who might remain acquaintances but are unlikely to pass into the realm of “friend”; the ones who immediately go to the shelves, grunting approvingly while noting the spines, and ask to borrow a couple are the keepers.

(Have I read all those books? Some, but not all. As the spunky little girl Marci says, in response to that exact question, in Cory Doctorow’s brilliant and mind-blowing SF novel Someone Comes to Town, Someone Leaves Town, “What’s the point of a bunch of books you’ve already read?”)

There’s a wonderful long article/essay in this week’s New York Times Magazine by Wired editor Kevin Kelly about the grand global move now underway, in the hands of both big corporations and individual geeks, to digitize every book in existence. He likens the project to the Library at Alexandria (“At one time or another, the library held about half a million scrolls, estimated to have been between 30 and 70 percent of all books in existence then.” -- wow), but it’ll be even better, creating one giant book of everything that’ll be crossreferenced and interlinked and tagged and annotated and geekified. It’ll be the world wiki, the global textual Flickr, and I cannot wait:

Turning inked letters into electronic dots that can be read on a screen is simply the first essential step in creating this new library. The real magic will come in the second act, as each word in each book is cross-linked, clustered, cited, extracted, indexed, analyzed, annotated, remixed, reassembled and woven deeper into the culture than ever before. In the new world of books, every bit informs another; every page reads all the other pages.

In recent years, hundreds of thousands of enthusiastic amateurs have written and cross-referenced an entire online encyclopedia called Wikipedia. Buoyed by this success, many nerds believe that a billion readers can reliably weave together the pages of old books, one hyperlink at a time. Those with a passion for a special subject, obscure author or favorite book will, over time, link up its important parts. Multiply that simple generous act by millions of readers, and the universal library can be integrated in full, by fans for fans.

In addition to a link, which explicitly connects one word or sentence or book to another, readers will also be able to add tags, a recent innovation on the Web but already a popular one. A tag is a public annotation, like a keyword or category name, that is hung on a file, page, picture or song, enabling anyone to search for that file. For instance, on the photo-sharing site Flickr, hundreds of viewers will "tag" a photo submitted by another user with their own simple classifications of what they think the picture is about: "goat," "Paris," "goofy," "beach party." Because tags are user-generated, when they move to the realm of books, they will be assigned faster, range wider and serve better than out-of-date schemes like the Dewey Decimal System, particularly in frontier or fringe areas like nanotechnology or body modification.

The link and the tag may be two of the most important inventions of the last 50 years. They get their initial wave of power when we first code them into bits of text, but their real transformative energies fire up as ordinary users click on them in the course of everyday Web surfing, unaware that each humdrum click "votes" on a link, elevating its rank of relevance. You may think you are just browsing, casually inspecting this paragraph or that page, but in fact you are anonymously marking up the Web with bread crumbs of attention. These bits of interest are gathered and analyzed by search engines in order to strengthen the relationship between the end points of every link and the connections suggested by each tag. This is a type of intelligence common on the Web, but previously foreign to the world of books.

Apart from his use of the slightly perjorative “nerd” -- these are really geeks we’re talking about -- I agree. This is a wildly exciting and optimistic vision for the future, and it’s something so rare these days that to read it is like finding an oasis in a vast desert. Kelly isn’t unrealistic -- much of his piece is devoted to the many, many obstacles standing in the project’s path. But what is especially thrilling to me is one of the underlying conceits of his vision: the idea of intellectual property moving away from the “property” -- what Kelly calls “the hegemony of the copy,” the physical manifestation of creative effort, whether a book or a CD or a DVD -- and toward the “intellectual,” the actual content and how it interrelates with the rest of the world’s “content.” It’s a vision full of hope for readers, writers, editors, reviewers and recommenders, students... everyone, really:

Bill McCoy, the general manager of Adobe's e-publishing business, says: "Some of us have thousands of books at home, can walk to wonderful big-box bookstores and well-stocked libraries and can get Amazon.com to deliver next day. The most dramatic effect of digital libraries will be not on us, the well-booked, but on the billions of people worldwide who are underserved by ordinary paper books." It is these underbooked — students in Mali, scientists in Kazakhstan, elderly people in Peru — whose lives will be transformed when even the simplest unadorned version of the universal library is placed in their hands.

Except for a few:

The fact is, entire industries and the fortunes of those working in them are threatened with demise. Newspapers and magazines, Hollywood, record labels, broadcasters and many hard-working and wonderful creative people in those fields have to change the model of how they earn money. Not all will make it.

Things will change. They’re already changing. Also this week, Tyler Cowen in Slate ponders whether the slow death of the independent bookstore is worth crying about. At the same time, Starbucks is holding author signings and is planning to offer cool stuff for customers to download in store -- perhaps like how Starbucks’ pushing of the movie Akeelah and the Bee turned out not to be the kind of crass corporate shilling you might expect, its pushing a new book by an unknown author could work out for the best too.

This isn’t like Wal-Mart pushing local stores out of business -- the way we buy milk and toothpaste and underwear is not the way we buy books (and music and movies). I love my Netflix subscription -- just upped it to eight discs out at a time, actually -- but I still marvel a little, every time I drop discs in a mailbox to wend their way back to a warehouse somewhere, at the inefficiency of shipping bits and bytes on a piece of plastic around the country when the whole exchange could be done far more quickly and easily online. (Until we can digitize milk and toothpaste and underwear, the same thing cannot be said about the exchange of money for those things.)

Books aren’t going away, of course -- but print on demand (which Tyler Cowen in Slate references) is, I think, gonna be the way to go, and I suspect that even traditional publishers will be doing POD more and more: what’s the point of printing thousands of books that may never sell? And it’s a spectacular solution to the “long tail” problem most books face (which Kelly discusses in the Times Magazine), the majority of its lifespan, after the (possible) initial flurry of interest when it’s first published, when it will sell a copy here and there only sporadically. Keeping a warehouse of books on hand to deal with that contingency is idiotic -- keeping an electronic file on server somewhere to print when a reader is interested is brilliant.

And there’s no need to anything to be out of print anymore, either. I’ve been working recently as a copywriter and editor for a little POD company called Cosimo Books, and I’m astonished at the amazing stuff Cosimo is suddenly making available again, in nice POD editions: cool geeky stuff, some of which you might expect, like Edgar Rice Burroughs’ At the Earth’s Core and The Warlords of Mars, and Jules Verne’s Five Weeks in a Balloon, but also some you’ve probably never even heard of (I hadn’t), like Lafcadio Hearn’s Kwaidan: Stories and Studies of Strange Things and Claude Bragdon’s A Primer of Higher Space (The Fourth Dimension). Those last two are some wild stuff, and there’s no way they’d have much of a chance of ever being found and read again without POD.

Like Kelly says, we’ve still got a long way to go before we get to the great and glorious global digital online book he’s talking about. Till then, between Cosimo and the recommendations of my new favorite blog, Bookslut, I think I’d better buy more bookshelves.

(Technorati tags: , , , , )

13 Comments

I love your litmus test for book-commenting visitors! I just moved at the beginning of the month, and in preparation, since last fall I managed to donate (no bookstore to purchase my used books, unfortunately) ten boxes full of hardcover novels and paperback romances. I even managed to have Salvation Army take away one of my six bookshelves, and not the smallest one, either! A major accomplishment for a bibliophile like me. Last year, I was helping my mom pack up her house for her move into her new husband's place just down the street. His daughter was also there, and was surprised that she had "so many books!" Considering her collection can MAYBE fill half of one of my bookshelves, Mom and I just looked at each other and burst out laughing. Quitting the bookstore I worked at part-time for eight years was probably the best thing I did to cut down on my rapidly expanding book collection. In the three years since I left, I've only purchased about 25 books total, most of them paperbacks that I ended up donating. Of course, that doesn't mean that the next time the national book convention is in town in a few years I won't be trying to attend, using my now-defunct status as an industry member (they're not too strict about checking credentials). BookExpo is a great place to get free books of all sorts--last time I went, I ended up bringing home about 150 books!
I worked for Book of the Month Club for 5 years, and I was coming home with free books constantly. Now I have to buy my books. :-(
There is one problem with the universal library, as I see it: how do you reconcile different versions of books? Just for an example, a reprinting or anniversary edition of a book, with a foreword by some celebrity, authorial corrections or out right deletions and expansions of the actual text, etc.? Recording every single version with every minor variation in the text would be a waste, even with information as tiny as plain text, but keeping only the original versions, devoid of the "look-back-at-the-effects-of-this-book-on-the-world" self-indulgent ramblings of authors or their famous friends, kind of misses the point if you're going to include links and tags. It's kinda like Star Wars. At this point, there've been, what, four editions of the original trilogy? (Original, THX, SpecialEd, DVDMix.) There are good and bad things about each version. This is to say nothing, of course, of any documentaries available on the video or DVD release of each version. But what I'd like to see is a "cut and paste" version, where you could arrange or delete scenes or even segments from the different versions to create your own "Ultimate Star Wars". Like, remove Greedo shooting first, but keep the dewbacks in the Tatooine desert, and keep Jabba, but remove that last pointless Boba Fett shot. Same thing for the Ultimate Library. For example, the Dark Elf trilogy books, by RA Salvatore. There have been at least versions of those, by my count. The originals, the omnibus with forewords and such, and the recent re-release with the "look at how cool this was" stuff by other Forgotten Realms/D&D writers and absolutely kickass covers. If you could have access to all the various introductions and prefaces and so on, that would be fine. But then we get to segmenting, and whether the book's whole is greater than the sum of its parts... And then there's the smell. Or lack thereof. Scent, as Giles rather nerdishly points out in a season 1 ep of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, is the most powerful key to memory we have. A particular flower, or welder's smoke, or a wood fire might bring back memories long lost. There's a reason why I have a web bookmark for The Man Who Was Thursday yet I still tried to find a copy at the nearest box store on Wednesday. The first time you read a book, the smell of the book and your surroundings become lodged in the brain, creating an experience that can't be duplicated by words on a screen. So books should be...smelly. And then there's the tactile sense of paper, and the eagerness to turn the page and find out what happens next as opposed to scrolling down the screen, and the fact that people are able to read hard copies faster than digital. (Don't ask me why, but Gil Grissom Said It, so it must be true!) Although to be fair, there's an option for recent versions of MS Office that mimicks turning pages, and even though it puts less data on each screen, you somehow find yourself reading faster. So maybe it's the act of turning many pages rather than scrolling down an endlessly long one. I'm not trying to be a Luddite. I love technology. But I like the scent of a bookstore, of new, fresh paper, and old, musty paper. And with a Universal Library there simply won't be enough demand for the huge, crowded-yet-quiet box stores or the cozy little indie stores with cramped staircases. They [i]will[/i] close, all except those that a parent corporation is willing to take a loss on (HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA). And while there will be convenience and affordability and even knowledge gained in the Universal Library, something will be lost. Something we can in all honesty live without, and an experience that may be more expensive than it's worth (consider the number of unsold books and how many trees were cut down to print them, for example). But something I'll miss. On the plus side, if we eventually get a fully-functional Universal Library, with Star-Trek like replication or nanotech editation to turn anything into a book, I'll be happier than a sus in feces.
...why did I use UBB code?
I talked about the sensuality of books in a post a while back: http://flickfilosopher.com/geekphilosophy/2005/10/dreams_of_a_dig.html I'll miss books, too. I bet there were people who, when they saw the coming of the automobile, got all misty-eyed and romantic about horse culture. I'm not saying it's wrong or foolish to romanticize books, but even though I'm sure hand-copied books on vellum pages were more beautiful than a cheap paperback today, I sure don't lament Gutenberg's invention. We'll find other things to romanticize. I'm sure someday we'll romanticize blogs and Web sites full of slow text instead of all the smell-o-xlm and immersive 3D environments that are surely on their way. Ah, for the days when surfing the net meant sitting in your underwear at a computer, not stuffed into a tactile bodysuit with electrodes taped to your genitals...
Oh, and as for reconciling different editions: Why bother? Storage is cheap: everything will get scanned eventually, even a book with 20 different versions.
Well I, for one, can't wait for the days when we surf the net stuffed into a tactile body suit with electrodes taped to our genitals.
I bet someone has already registered "KickToTheNuts.com" in preparation for that very day.
I fear it, personally. (Gah! Luddite tendencies again.) When that day comes, all men (and probably a decent perecentage of women) will spend the rest of their days surfing porn/"erotica" sites, not even stopping to go to the bathroom or eat. And civilization will come crashing down.
You mean we'll all get addicted to the holodeck like Barclay? :->
I'm one of those who thinks we'll be regularly using paper and books for centuries to come - because the book is a *superior* technology to electronic substitutes, because it works so splendidly with the human eye and brain. It's the "random access" aspect. For instance, if you're in a bookstore, you can probably pick up a given book and, based on a quick leaf-through, decide whether you want to buy it or not. Based on principles and methodology you probably couldn't describe in detail if you tried. (I do think paper will be supplanted for *many* current uses - the printed multi-volume encyclopedia is already a dinosaur, for example.)
Just to assert my geek cred: I first encountered the line “What’s the point of a bunch of books you’ve already read?” in Harlan Ellison's Paladin of the Lost Hour, nearly 20 years old at this point. No comment on the digital library stuff; been there, done that... might be doing it again, Lord help me...
Ah, so Cory was paying homage to Harlan? Makes sense.

Leave a comment


I'm MaryAnn Johanson, writer and editor, and this is my scratch pad, idea-jotter-downer, portfolio and resume, and general hang-out blog.

• film/TV/pop culture critic at FlickFilosopher.com
• contributor, Film.com
• member, Online Film Critics Society
• member, Alliance of Women Film Journalists
• member, International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences

[become a Facebook fan]
[visit my personal Facebook page]
[follow me on Twitter]


Location: New York City
[email me]

photo by David Speranza

archives

recently at FlickFilosopher.com

Powered by Movable Type 5.01

what I’m watching
(region 1)

what I’m watching
(region 2)

what I’m reading



my book
(Amazon U.S.)

my book
(Amazon U.K.)