my own private I dunno: résumé | screenplays | fan fiction

Evil advertising: General Motors and Everclear

| | comments (8)

General Motors lost $8.6 billion dollars in 2005.

Lost.

$8.6 billion.

Billion.

Or maybe it’s actually $10.6 billion.

And GM is so fuckin’ desperate for your money, and my money, that it has launched an insidious TV ad to convince us that the company is so damn cool that you dare NOT buy a GM vehicle. You’ve probably seen it: it’s called “Then and Now,” and features a montage of retro footage of sock hops and cars with fins intercut with 21st-century auto-erotica set to the Everclear tune “AM Radio.” (You can watch the ad here.)

Evil enough that -- I think -- the ad’s creative team may have missed the point of Everclear’s song. I’ve always been particularly struck by this verse (which doesn’t appear in the ad):

I’d be in bed with the radio on
I would listen to it all night long
Just to hear my favorite song
You’d have to wait but you could hear it on the am radio

[from LyricsFreak.com]

Maybe I’m wrong, but isn’t this sorta saying that that was fun, to lie awake all night waiting for a song you loved to come on? I know it was for me, when I was a kid, and that it really isn’t the same thing today to be able to play a favorite song -- on a CD or an MP3 or whatever -- whenever I want. It was the anticipation and the waiting that made it extra sweet when you did finally hear that song. (There was an interesting discussion on Plastic last year about the misuse of pop and rock songs in advertising...) Hard to imagine that there was a time, and it was only 35 years ago, when instant gratification was not possible in all aspects of American culture. (Not that it’s not seductive -- I’m currently engaged in a geeky debate with myself over whether I should order the new Doctor Who DVD set from Amazon.ca or let myself enjoy the sweet misery of weekly anticipation while it unreels on SciFi...)

But it’s not the idea that maybe everything new isn’t necessarily cool that is so wrongheaded about the GM spot: It’s how evilly catchy it is. Purely as media experience, the ad is brilliant -- I love it every time I see it. Even though I know how mendacious it is to suggest that that same company that produces Hummers for the mass market:

Gmhummer

...is the same one that’s gonna save us from our gas-guzzling ways:

Gmhydro

For GM to position itself as totally pro ecology and saving the Earth, yo, is so deceptive as to be outright criminal, particularly when you know that the asinine federal laws governing these things mean that, as TerraPass’s TerraBlog points out:

AFE stands for Corporate Average Fuel Economy, and, as the name implies, the standard sets benchmarks for the average fuel economy that car manufacturers must achieve across their entire fleets.

The problem is that manufacturers have no incentive to exceed the CAFE standards, so every hybrid car they sell gives them the opportunity to peddle another gas guzzler to less environmentally-conscious consumers.

Keep that in mind next time you’re boogeying to GM’s ad.

8 Comments

As for you internal debate on Doctor Who, through the magic of teh intarweb, I watched them as they were originally aired. And I am soo looking forward to the new season coming soon. Do not know if I will care for Torchwood, but will still check it out.
I haven't seen the ads yet so I can't comment about them, but as for fuel economy... It's true that GM sells Hummers and inefficient vehicles, and they should have had more hybrids by now, but they are unfairly criticized in terms of their overall fuel efficiency. See this post I wrote on my other blog Detroit Essentials which explains how competitive their volume products are. http://uh2l.blogs.com/detroitessentials/2006/03/detroit_auto_in.html - Atul
FYI, I tried ordering the Doctor Who DVDs from amazon.ca (yes, I'm a total convert now!) They have its availability as "ships in 4 to 6 weeks." I'm not totally certain, but my guess is that this is amazon.ca complying with an embargo on sales to the U.S. until the DVDs are released here. (Either that or they're completely sold out, and nobody is very anxious to make more, which I find doubtful.) I'm curious about how they do this sort of thing technically, and whether it's done often. (If you're going to amazon.ca from a Canadian IP address, does it have 24 hour availability?)
They have its availability as "ships in 4 to 6 weeks." === Noooooooooooo..... I blame the Daleks.
It's true that GM sells Hummers and inefficient vehicles, and they should have had more hybrids by now, but they are unfairly criticized in terms of their overall fuel efficiency. ==== We're fucked if "having a lot of cars that do better than 30MPG" is a good sign. We need walkable cities, not sprawling exurbs. We need better mass transit, not HOV lanes. If we're not going to get those things -- and I'm not stupid enough to think we will in the next few decades -- then we need drastic disincentives for corps like GM to build gaz guzzlers and for drivers to buy them, not rules that allow GM et al to balance out every hybrid with a Hummer.
I agree that the CAFE laws don't work. The only thing that would work is higher gas taxes, but that will never fly in a democracy like ours since our country thinks of low gas prices as a God-given right. It's also regressive. Walking, bicycling, and public transportation is the real answer. My solution is this... Give a sliding tax deduction, (not just for hybrids). If a car gets 45 mpg (could be a diesel), you get a $4,000 deduction. If you have a car with 30 mpg, then you get $1,000. At the mandated average, you get 0 deductions, and if your fuel economy is lower, you pay extra tax. People are quick to blame the car companies, and true they do share some of the blame, but let's start blaming the consumers. Nobody's forcing them to buy V6's instead of more than adequate 4-cylinder engines. A car company would go out of business if it didn't try to meet the demands of the consumer while other companies did.
Trouble is, mass transit isn't the panacea a lot of people would like it to be. When you actually take a good hard look at the numbers, it only really makes sense (as a *major* helper, that is) from a cost-benefit perspective in one U.S. city - New York. It's tremendously successful there due to a bunch of factors you don't have in other American cities: basically, very high population density, and a mass transit infrastructure that got started in the 19th century. Elsewhere, subway systems in particular tend to be boondoggles, basically an expensive subsidy benefitting a tiny percentage of the population that can conveniently use it. Which tends to be a *wealthy* subset, at that, for various reasons (mainly, I think, because real estate near subway stations gains value, and you tend to build stations in places that already have high land value.) For instance, for me, the Washington Metro system is pretty useless. Traffic is certainly horrendous enough that I'd theoretically *like* to use it, but it doesn't go where I need it to go, at least not in a way that wouldn't add hours to an already long daily commute. I believe the best bang for the buck in mass transit turns out to be improvements to the lowly bus.
Boston...Boston is good too. I haven't gotten to Seattle yet, but I already know I'll miss the T. And it's subway was actually first, before NY (they like to brag about that). Not quite as good as NY I guess, but good enough for to make it rather silly to have a car right there in the middle of things.

Leave a comment


I'm MaryAnn Johanson, writer and editor, and this is my scratch pad, idea-jotter-downer, portfolio and resume, and general hang-out blog.

• film/TV/pop culture critic at FlickFilosopher.com
• contributor, Film.com
• member, Online Film Critics Society
• member, Alliance of Women Film Journalists
• member, International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences

[become a Facebook fan]
[visit my personal Facebook page]
[follow me on Twitter]


Location: New York City
[email me]

photo by David Speranza

archives

recently at FlickFilosopher.com

Powered by Movable Type 5.01

what I’m watching
(region 1)

what I’m watching
(region 2)

what I’m reading



my book
(Amazon U.S.)

my book
(Amazon U.K.)