my own private I dunno: résumé | screenplays | fan fiction

Turtles all the way down

| | comments (11)

Pennsylvania dumps "intelligent design," but Kansas embraces it. Two steps forward, one step back. Meanwhile, The Revealer looks at why it should be called malevolent design:

The Designer who so Intelligently Designed our world, in theory, could be malevolent or capricious just as easily as he could be all good. He might have designed us intelligently, but for the purpose of watching us tear each others' throats out. He might have designed us intelligently, but on a whim, and then forgotten all about us. In theological terms, ID suggests forces operating upon the world from without, but it does not say whether that those forces are good or evil. You could hypothesize, for example, that a Satanist could step forward to support ID. Yes, the world shows evidence of an intelligent designer, but one with a sick sense of humor. Therefore, the Satanist might conclude, Intelligent Design is correct, and we should worship the Devil, since the world seems more like his handiwork than the Other Guy's.

Is it just me, or:

Malevolentdesign

Cthulhu or the Flying Spaghetti Monster -- is one a worse deity than the other?

As always, The Onion has the most excellent final word:

As an ill-informed pseudo-intellectual with a particular interest in the unverifiable, I'm always on the lookout for some partially thought out misinformation. So, if you have an uninformed solution to a dilemma that doesn't actually exist, don't bother double-checking your information. I'm all ears.

11 Comments

I live in Kansas, so believe me I'm particularly sensitive to this issue. Last time Kansas rejected evolution, the Board of Education was voted out in the next election and evolution restored. I can only hope that the same thing happens here.
Where do your own standards of good and evil come from? When you say that an intelligent designer could fashion a world that is one or the other, you are sneaking in the assumption that you yourself know the difference. Do you?
Alex, that's been my general impression - that the main long-term effect of stuff like this is to get people to pay attention to local school board elections, and to not allow the circumstances where the only person interested in running is a fundamentalist looney. Do you know why the last restoration in Kansas apparently "didn't take?" The entire phenomenon of "Intelligent Design" is, I think, something of a victory for the good guys. The *only* way the creationists can possibly win is by travelling under the false flag of Science. The honest approach ("Evolution shouldn't be taught because God, and the Bible") won't fly anymore.
Mary Anne, are you saying you've been touched by His Noodly Appendage?
I thought the relationship between Cthulhu and the Flying Spaghetti Monster was so obvious as to not require comment. Very clearly, H.P. Lovecraft was drawing on buried human racial memory of the Flying Spaghetti Monster from earliest days....
"Mary Anne, are you saying you've been touched by His Noodly Appendage?" I am exploring the possibilities of Pastafarianism, let's just say that. "Do you know why the last restoration in Kansas apparently 'didn't take?'" Good question. Is this a different Kansas board of education? (In New York State, the boards are local -- there isn't just one board for the whole state.) "Where do your own standards of good and evil come from? When you say that an intelligent designer could fashion a world that is one or the other, you are sneaking in the assumption that you yourself know the difference. Do you?" Of course I know the difference -- they are encoded in our culture. That's where you get them, too... and people who profess to believe in a god who hands down such things know it too, though they may not want to admit it. Look: If whatever "God" does is automatically "good," then this god could, say, slaughter an entire population and it would hence have to be considered "good" because (supposedly) this deity does not do evil. But, the rejoinder is, "God wouldn't do that because it's evil." Well, that presupposes a measure of "good" and "evil" that is outside the puview of a deity. Either whatever God does defines good, or it doesn't. Can't have it both ways. And if anyone says "We can't always understand the things that God does," I'm gonna scream.
I can't believe I spelled your name wrong...my head is hanging in shame.
Well, I don't always understand the things I do, much less the actions of certain supernatural entities. But that's just me.
Alleged supernatural entities, don't you mean?
FSM is undeniably better, unless you happen to be on the Atkins Diet.
But FSM is very Atkins-friendly, because of his very high-carb nature! Of course we low-carb people wouldn't want to eat the Flying Spaghetti Monster, but what sort of followers would actually *eat* their deity? Oh, besides Catholics, that is.... ;)

Leave a comment


I'm MaryAnn Johanson, writer and editor, and this is my scratch pad, idea-jotter-downer, portfolio and resume, and general hang-out blog.

• film/TV/pop culture critic at FlickFilosopher.com
• contributor, Film.com
• member, Online Film Critics Society
• member, Alliance of Women Film Journalists
• member, International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences

[become a Facebook fan]
[visit my personal Facebook page]
[follow me on Twitter]


Location: New York City
[email me]

photo by David Speranza

archives

recently at FlickFilosopher.com

Powered by Movable Type 5.01

what I’m watching
(region 1)

what I’m watching
(region 2)

what I’m reading



my book
(Amazon U.S.)

my book
(Amazon U.K.)