my own private I dunno: résumé | screenplays | fan fiction

Geek helpless against appeal of books

| | comments (9)

Newspaper headlines don’t get much more dire than this:

World Helpless Against Assaults of Nature

I mean: Wow. The Associated Press’s Calvin Woodward just kinda dives right into the deep end of the panic-and-depair pool:

WASHINGTON -- In a more hopeful time, buoyed by the promise of science, it was thought hurricanes could be tricked into dispersing, earthquakes could be disarmed by nuclear explosions and floodwaters held at bay by great mounds of dirt.

Such conceits are another victim of a year of destruction.

The planet's controlling forces romp over dreams like those. Usually the best that can be done is to see the danger coming long enough to run.

Rich and poor nations have taken the hit over a period so twisted in nature's assaults that one month, rich is helping poor and the next, poor is helping rich as best it can, and then the poor gets slammed once again.

And the bird-flu pandemic hasn’t even hit yet.

Good thing he didn’t just finish reading John Barnes’s 1994 SF novel Mother of Storms, like I just did, which is a fairly horrifying futuristic disaster tale about superhurricanes that threaten to destroy civilization as we know it when a tactical nuclear strike over the Arctic releases all the methane (a greenhouse gas) bound up in the water ice there, which heats up the atmosphere and the oceans till the Atlantic and the Pacific turn into nurseries that look to spawn and nurture perpetual storms. It was especially horrifying to be reading MoS this week, when New York City is being deluged by remnants of some tropical storm or other with a name further down the alphabet than I think we’ve ever seen before. (Tammy, maybe?) And yet the book was somewhat comforting, too, because all I could think this morning, as I got drenched running for the bus and then the train got delayed because subway tunnels were flooding, was that at least we weren’t dealing with a storm surge powerful enough to wash completely over Ireland and Florida and scour Hawaii down to bare rock, as Barnes’s characters have to deal with.

If Woodward had read Mother of Storms, he’d know that in fact there may be a way to defang hurricanes, even ones with *gulp* supersonic wind speeds. Of course, it requires that we pass through the Singularity...

Speaking of the subway, and of bird flu, there was a guy on the train the other night hacking up his lungs, he was coughing so hard -- people were moving away from him, it was that scary. It made me think it’s about time I picked up my dogeared copy of The Stand for a fifth or sixth read...

Maybe after I finish Jasper Fforde’s Something Rotten, the latest installment in the adventures of Thursday Next, literary detective. Fforde’s books are brilliant, and supremely geeky, kinda like Douglas Adams meets Neil Gaiman at a literary salon hosted by Jane Austen... or Elmore Leonard. Thursday lives in a geek’s dream world, where writers are like rock stars and mobsters pirate Kit Marlowe first editions and absolutely everyone is crazy for literature that way the people in the mundane world are for TV or pro sports. But it gets even better: characters can leave books, and readers can enter them, which is why Jurisfiction cops like Thursday are needed, to keep everyone where they should be.

A little hint of Thursday’s world snuck into ours recently (maybe she stepped off the pages of one of Fforde’s books), with the first Quill Awards:

The Quills, aiming to become a flashier event than other literary awards, added "Oscar" touches like a red carpet for authors, comedy stars to entertain guests and some well known hosts from the television world.

The best geek-on-geekiness comment:

The effort to boost the profile of books drew ironic comment from Jon Stewart, whose "America" won the humor category. "Finally," he said, "we have an event to bring together the glamour of literature and the gravitas of an awards program."

And the most unlikely sign that Thursday really has stepped into our world and is influencing it:

The event will be broadcast on NBC television on October 22.

A literary award show? On network television? What’s next: physics hottie Brian Greene on the cover of GQ?

9 Comments

Just out of curiousity, how can a rational, secular atheist like yourself enjoy The Stand? I thought it was one of the worst, anti-human, pro-faith books I've ever read.
Speaking as another rational, secular atheist -- I can enjoy stories that nonetheless have themes that offend me. I haven't read The Stand (I think I'm perhaps unique in my generation for not finding King all that compelling), but I've always enjoyed the transparently pro-Christian (and anti-Islam) Narnia books, and I've always suspected I might find the Left Behind books a guilty pleasure (if I ever sunk low enough to read them).
What Mark said. *The Stand* is fantasy. If you read the Bible as fantasy, it's a pretty amazing story, too. There are no real orcs or magic rings, either, but I can accept such things within the context of a well-told story, like *The Lord of the Rings.* But the minute someone decides to start killing people in the name of Frodo -- or deciding what our children should learn in school based upon what Stu Redman believed -- is the minute I go ballistic.
Actually, from what I remember of "The Stand," Stu Redman was a far more benign role model than, say, Randall Flagg. Okay, that's obviously not saying much, but I'd still like to see more people emulate the example of Stu Redman--a strong, brave guy who nevertheless didn't feel to micromanage the private life of everyone who was different than he was--than emulate some of the more "respectable" fictional characters that have come along since then. Besides, Stu Redman was more neutral in regard to gay rights than the average Christian fundamentalist will ever be. That alone will guarantee that his beliefs will never become part of anyone's educational agenda...
BTW, you should write Jasper Fforde's "The Big Over Easy" as well if you ever get the chance, MaryAnn. I just started it and it seems almost as entertaining as the Thursday Next books. And am I the only one you know who is eagerly anticipating the Hugh Laurie novel, "Paper Soldier," which is supposed to appear in 2006? (Of course, it was "supposed to appear" in print several years ago, but if it's as good as Laurie's "The Gun Seller," it would be worth the wait. Of course, with my luck, it will probably see print just one month after the publication of Harlan Ellison's "Last Dangerous Visions," which at last report had just been postponed to the day after the day hell freezes over...
"Actually, from what I remember of "The Stand," Stu Redman was a far more benign role model than, say, Randall Flagg." The problem with people wanting to teach kids only what Stu Redman believed wouldn't be about the worthiness of Stu's beliefs but the blind, unthinking faith with which his adherents would wield those beliefs... or, more likely, a distortion of those beliefs bandied about by someone with his own agenda who is less than Stu-fearing. Regardless of how great a guy Stu is, people who'd slap bumper stickers on their cars that say "Stu said, I believe it, that settles it" would be very scary people. "I'd still like to see more people emulate the example of Stu Redman" Sure, and I'd like to see more people -- particularly the ones who call themselves Christian -- emulate the example of Jesus. But it ain't gonna happen.
So ideally, we should all live in a country in which the government doesn't encourage us to believe in anything. A country in which belief in organized religion is not only not encouraged but actively discouraged. And those who defy the law on that matter are put into jail. Or concentration camps. Surely then we would be living in the best of all possible worlds, right? Okay, I don't actually believe that. But many people throughout the world--especially in China and Cuba--unfortunately do. Frankly, I'd rather live in a country like our own that is officially neutral on religious matters than a Christian theocracy. But I don't honestly believe theocracy is the only thing we have to fear.
"Frankly, I'd rather live in a country like our own that is officially neutral on religious matters than a Christian theocracy." Amen. So to speak. I think you may have misinterpreted some comment of mine, but I'm not sure which one or how.
Wasn't The Stand really more about the notion of civilization and what it means? Yes, it's presented religiously, but really it's more about highly regimented order as a model of civilisation (which King attacks,) vs. smaller, human interaction based civilisation (which he lauds). It actually strikes me as somewhat similar to 28 Days Later, although I think 28 Days Later had a more sophisticated narrative philosophy. (It encompassed three viewpoints where The Stand really only had room for two, and I've never been fond of dualism.)

Leave a comment


I'm MaryAnn Johanson, writer and editor, and this is my scratch pad, idea-jotter-downer, portfolio and resume, and general hang-out blog.

• film/TV/pop culture critic at FlickFilosopher.com
• contributor, Film.com
• member, Online Film Critics Society
• member, Alliance of Women Film Journalists
• member, International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences

[become a Facebook fan]
[visit my personal Facebook page]
[follow me on Twitter]


Location: New York City
[email me]

photo by David Speranza

archives

recently at FlickFilosopher.com

Powered by Movable Type 5.01

what I’m watching
(region 1)

what I’m watching
(region 2)

what I’m reading



my book
(Amazon U.S.)

my book
(Amazon U.K.)