my own private I dunno: résumé | screenplays | fan fiction

Gen X is moving and shaking...

| | comments (10)

So, I’m putting together a list of movers and shakers of Generation X, which I’ll share soon and will continue adding to forever. Prior to last week, Anderson Cooper of CNN would not have been on the list -- I’ve always found him infuriatingly shallow, and not in that people-are-misinterpreting-GenX way, but as in actual infuriating shallowness. But last week, in his on-the-scene coverage of the devastation Katrina left in her wake, Cooper (Xer, born 1967) was a new man:

050902_angryandcoop_ex_1

On September 1, during a live, on-air interview with a water carrier for the Bush administration, Cooper had this to say:

Excuse me, Senator, I'm sorry for interrupting. I haven't heard that, because, for the last four days, I've been seeing dead bodies in the streets here in Mississippi. And to listen to politicians thanking each other and complimenting each other, you know, I got to tell you, there are a lot of people here who are very upset, and very angry, and very frustrated.

And when they hear politicians slap -- you know, thanking one another, it just, you know, it kind of cuts them the wrong way right now, because literally there was a body on the streets of this town yesterday being eaten by rats because this woman had been laying in the street for 48 hours. And there's not enough facilities to take her up.

Now, the point really isn’t to whom Cooper was talking or even what he was so angry about -- what knocked me off my feet (I was watching this as it happened) was how dramatic and sudden the paradigm shift was: We went from "journalists" who’d drunk the Kool-Aid -- whatever the Kool-Aid of the moment was -- toeing the party line -- whoever the party was -- to, well, actual, genuine, human anger, like we haven’t seen in my memory. We’ve seen decades of bullshit from the rich and powerful go, for the most part, unchallenged, even uncommented on, by the people whose jobs it’s supposed to be to do those very things, and now, literally overnight, they’ve found their backbone. Even 9/11 didn’t have this affect. As a commentary essay on BBC News noted, "last week the complacency stopped, and the moral indignation against inadequate government began to flow..." (Jack Shafer at Slate has a nice rundown of the wakeup.)

CNN’s Miles O’Brien has also noticeably awakened from his coma -- he’s definitely a geek and may be an Xer; I haven’t been able to learn his date of birth, and I’m terrible at guessing people’s ages, but he looks like could be on the Boomer/Xer cusp.

It’s too early to say if this sudden reappearance of a vigorous watchdog press will endure to amount to anything useful, but if it does, we may look back at Katrina as the moment when Xers reached the kind of cultural maturity needed to begin really shaping the next era of American (and global) history. (Which isn’t to say that other older journalists weren’t getting plenty pissed and not letting corporate HQ shut them up; Jack Cafferty on CNN and Geraldo Rivera on Fox have been downright quivering with indignation) Anderson Cooper, we may then recognize, will have been one of the standard bearers.

10 Comments

I think that most of the Xer journalists covering the White House for the mainstream media (as opposed to bloggers and online journos) have been cowed by Washington politics, especially as displayed by this administration. A typically pragmatic approach to keeping access to TPTB and, consequently, their jobs, but one that has disappointed me utterly. If they've finally gotten enough confidence to emulate their heros (Woodward and Bernstein, Breslin, Ellerbee, Ivins), I might actually tune into the network news once in a while. I even steered clear of the Katrina coverage until Wednesday just because I had gotten so out of the habit of watching TV news channels and shows. The Daily Show's line (during the recent pile-on of Karl Rove) that "We've secretly replaced the White House press corps with real journalists. Let's see if anyone noticed!" was all too accurate.
My husband actually called me (I was out of town) and told me about that Anderson Cooper interview. I wish I could've seen it.
See the Cooper video here, via Crooks and Liars: http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/09/01.html#a4740
I'm told Miles O'Brien is 46, which means he was born in 1958 or 59, which puts him too far on the wrong side of the Boomer/Xer cusp. The very earliest birth year I'd stretch Xers to is 1960, though 61 or 62 may be the more likely demarcation. This article mentions his age: http://www.asiamedia.ucla.edu/article-us.asp?parentid=26921
Yeah, GenX is traditionally accepted to be those born between 1961 and 1981. I prefer 1963, myself, though. Set it at 1961, and Christopher Atkins, Melissa Ethridge, Laurence Fishburne, Wayne Gretzky, Richard Hatch (Survivor), Mariel Hemingway, Carl Lewis, Heather Locklear, Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Eddie Murphy, Meg Ryan, Princess Diana Spencer, George Stephanopoulos, and both Joanie and Chachi... all Xers. Granted, both Peter Jackson and Todd McFarlane were also born in 1961, but I say we set the date in 1963 and make the two of them honorary members of our generation. ;-) -Jester
I'm somewhat inclined toward the "Generation Jones" notion, which posits a subgeneration with its own distinct identity between boomers and Generation X: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_Jones Said to be for birth years 1954-1965. I tend to think 1965ish is an appropriate start date for GenX, but that 1954 is too early for this subgeneration - the 1954-60ish birth years seem generally steeped in and part of the ruling Boomer culture. But the notion of a smaller, transitional, neither-here-nor-there subgeneration sounds right to me.
According to Strauss and Howe, the last few years of a generation and the first few of the following one have a tendency to be in flux. Personally, my mother (1939 birth year, in the waning end of the Silent gen) is more Boomerish in outlook, but my dad (1940) is definitely more Silent. Both their younger siblings (Mom's sister, 1944, and Dad's brother, also 1944) were very much Boomer. S&H's definition of Gen X as beginning in 1961 is a legitimate one, IMO, just from what I've seen in my own brother (1961 cohort) throughout his life.
Please define "wrong side." Every time I come to this blog I feel like a black person at the KKK web site. I hate to tell you this, folks, but as much as it may surprise you, baby boomers are NOT responsible for all the evil in the world.
In all fairness, Jill, I seem to remember you having some harsh things to say about the WWII generation on another site... But to be really fair, I find all this generational stuff to be a bit silly. Every generation believes itself to be the most misunderstood generation that ever existed and every generation likes to think that the one immediately before it has profited unfairly from its life experience and that the one immediately after it is being judged way too laxly. I'll admit to a little bias here. I was born in 1961; my little sister was born in 1962. My two younger brothers were born in 1963 and 1964. According to the logic displayed by Jester up above, my younger brothers should be in a totally different generation than my sister and me. Somehow, that doesn't quite make sense. Besides, social differences don't always have anything to do with generational differences. Sometimes, I find I'm different because I'm Catholic in a predominantly Protestant country. Or Hispanic in a predominantly non-Hispanic country. Or a southpaw in a world of right-handers. Or a sci-fi fan in a world where sci fi doesn't always get much respect and any sci fi fan who prefers something other than "Star Wars" or "Star Trek" seems especially isolated. It all depends on the circumstances. Anyway, what goes around comes around and the judgment you encourage your elders today will be leveled against you tomorrow. I've already seen evidence on the Web of Gen-Xers displaying the same attitude towards so-called "Millenium kids" that they themselves used to complain about receiving from Baby Boomers. The cycle never ends... But then everyone needs to feel special and the price you often pay for said special-ness can be higher than you think... As long as I'm spouting cliches here, judge not lest...
D'oh! That fourth from last paragraph in my last post was meant to read: Anyway, what goes around comes around and the judgment you encourage against your elders today will be leveled against you tomorrow.

Leave a comment


I'm MaryAnn Johanson, writer and editor, and this is my scratch pad, idea-jotter-downer, portfolio and resume, and general hang-out blog.

• film/TV/pop culture critic at FlickFilosopher.com
• contributor, Film.com
• member, Online Film Critics Society
• member, Alliance of Women Film Journalists
• member, International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences

Location: New York City
[email me]

photo by David Speranza

archives

recently at FlickFilosopher.com

Powered by Movable Type 4.1

what I’m watching
(region 1)

what I’m watching
(region 2)

what I’m reading

my book
(Amazon U.S.)

my book
(Amazon U.K.)