my own private I dunno: résumé | screenplays | fan fiction

Red pill, blue pill: Matrix philosophy goes mainstream

| | comments (3)

The idea that there’s more to the world than what we can see with our own eyes is hardly new. It underlies most religions; it inspired Plato’s cave; it has nagged at the consciousness of pop culture since its birth in the Victorian era, with works such as Alice in Wonderland and Peter Pan. It is the embodiment, perhaps, of all human spiritual yearning, religious or not.

Our grandparents shared Dorothy’s trip to Oz, for instance, in 1939, and probably felt that Dorothy’s mantra "There’s no place like home" applied to them, too -- after the trials of the Great Depression, and with war threatening to catch fire in Europe, home and family must have felt like a cozy retreat from reality. Sixty years later, though, that notion was turned on its head to encapsulate the geek/GenX mindset in The Matrix [click for my review]. Thomas Anderson doesn’t have a mantra: instead he has the disturbing wisdom of Morpheus, who says things like "You’ve felt it your entire life, that there’s something wrong with the world. You don’t know what it is, but it’s there, like a splinter in your mind, driving you mad" and "The Matrix is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth." Home is not a comfort to Neo. Before he discovered the truth, home was a place where he didn’t fit in; now home is worse: it’s a lie, a deception. The Matrix is "there’s no place like home" turned inside out, where you can’t be comfortable anywhere, and if you do, that’s probably not a safe place to be.

The Matrix was dismissed and derided and -- perhaps worst of all -- blamed for the Columbine massacre, as if over the course of the three weeks between the movie’s release and the tragedy a couple of well-adjusted kids could be transformed into homicidal maniacs because they saw a movie a few times.

And now we have The Traveler, by the mysterious and perhaps pseudonymous John Twelve Hawks, the literary phenomenon of the summer that was on the New York Times’ bestselling list last month and currently sits at the very respectable ranking of 675 on Amazon.com’s book list. It’s an elegantly written novel of contemporary speculative fantasy about an Illuminati-like group that controls the world, keeping an unwitting populace in submission through fads and pop culture and the daily grind, and the small group of people who oppose them. It’s even got a bit of 1984 thrown in, too: "There was no need to worry about religion or philosophy; the truth was determined by whoever was in power." It’s Matrix-y in the extreme; it is clearly science fiction, for all that, like The Matrix, it feels like it gets perilously close to a hard truth about how we as a society have abdicated genuine feeling and zestful living for

But that’s not the way it’s been treated. Publishers Weekly, in a starred review, torturously attempts to frame the book as anything but SF: "Twelve Hawks’s much anticipated novel is powerful, mainstream fiction built on a foundation of cutting-edge technology laced with fantasy and the chilling specter of an all-too-possible social and political reality." (The book is also, PW notes, "the first in a trilogy," and if that doesn’t set off SF bells, then nothing will.) I’d call that a triumph for geek culture, a sign that that off-kilter philosophies that occup the geek mind truly have been acknowledged as something other than weird and cultish... but that’s not the case here. I mean, that is happening, certainly -- movies like The Matrix and books like The Traveler don’t enjoy this kind of success if they’re not pushing buttons for a whole lot of people.

The "problem" is that the people who think they’re the arbiters of culture -- like Publishers Weekly, like The New York Times, which recently featured this bizarre non sequiter in a review of books about Jimi Hendrix: "Drug use made him blurry and rambling, with an increasingly weird affinity for science fiction" -- aren’t ready to admit yet that the culture has changed. It’s ironic, actually, because they’re suffering from the same delusions as the people who live in the Matrix, and the people who remain ignorant of the Travelers. They think they understand what the world is all about, and they couldn’t be more wrong.

3 Comments

People have been doing this rendition of the it's-not-really-SF-if-it's-popular mamba for years, MaryAnn. They did with "Brave New World," they did with "1984," and they're doing it today. Who cares? Some of my favorite stories of late come from the sf genre and quite frequently they have more to say about the world around us than so-called mainstream literature. In fact, I find it quite ironic that the strongest criticism of so-called mainstream literature to date came in a Salon.com interview with author Dan Simmons--an author who btw first started out in the sf genre...
You're absolutely right that dancing around the SF thing is nothing new, and of course it doesn't change one's enjoyment of whatever everyone is pretending isn't SF. But the difference today is that there's a whole subculture -- one that's practically the mainstream culture -- that is being dissed.
I've read The Traveler -- and some of the things written about it -- and this is the first comment I've seen that tries to put the book into a larger contex. SF gives writers the opportunity to explore larger political and philosophical issues. (In some ways, The Traveler is a very politial book) In contrast, mainstream writers seem to concentrate on domestic dramas or find-the-serial-killer entertaiment. Nothing wrong with that, but sometimes you want a big picture of where we might be going.

Leave a comment


I'm MaryAnn Johanson, writer and editor, and this is my scratch pad, idea-jotter-downer, portfolio and resume, and general hang-out blog.

• film/TV/pop culture critic at FlickFilosopher.com
• contributor, Film.com
• member, Online Film Critics Society
• member, Alliance of Women Film Journalists
• member, International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences

[become a Facebook fan]
[visit my personal Facebook page]
[follow me on Twitter]


Location: New York City
[email me]

photo by David Speranza

archives

recently at FlickFilosopher.com

Powered by Movable Type 5.01

what I’m watching
(region 1)

what I’m watching
(region 2)

what I’m reading



my book
(Amazon U.S.)

my book
(Amazon U.K.)